WebGPU and WGSL by Example: Fractals, Image Effects, Ray-Tracing, Procedural Geometry, 2D/3D, Particles, Simulations

About This Book

WebGPU and WGSL by Example: Fractals, Image Effects, Ray-Tracing, Procedural Geometry, 2D/3D, Particles, Simulations is a groundbreaking exploration of webgpu that has captivated readers worldwide. With 1288+ copies sold, this definitive guide offers innovative insights into webgpu.

Why You'll Love It

• Comprehensive coverage of programming
• 12 chapters packed with cutting-edge research
• Perfect for academic study
• Includes illustrations

In the News

Reader Reviews

Robert Williams

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

April 22, 2025

I'll be honest, I wasn't sure what to expect with WebGPU and WGSL by Example: Fractals, Image Effects, Ray-Tracing, Procedural Geometry, 2D/3D, Particles, Simulations, but wow! It completely blew me away. The way the author explains simulation made everything click for me. I've been struggling with webgpu for years, and this book gave me the tools I needed. My favorite part was when they talked about webgpu - it reminded me so much of my own experience with simulation. I've already recommended it to all my friends!

David Davis

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

July 28, 2025

WebGPU and WGSL by Example: Fractals, Image Effects, Ray-Tracing, Procedural Geometry, 2D/3D, Particles, Simulations is a comprehensive exploration of webgpu that manages to be both accessible to newcomers and valuable to experts. The book is divided into 3 sections, each building thoughtfully on the last. Part 1's discussion of graphics is particularly strong, with clear examples and practical applications. The diagrams and illustrations throughout help clarify complex ideas, and the chapter summaries are excellent for review. My only minor critique is that some examples felt dated, but this doesn't detract from the overall quality. This will undoubtedly become a standard reference in the field.

Jessica Williams

★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆

April 8, 2025

While WebGPU and WGSL by Example: Fractals, Image Effects, Ray-Tracing, Procedural Geometry, 2D/3D, Particles, Simulations makes several valuable points about graphics, I found some aspects problematic. The author's treatment of webgpu seems oversimplified, particularly when compared to graphics. That said, the sections on ai are genuinely insightful and make the book worth reading despite its flaws. With some refinement in wgsl, this could be a truly outstanding work.

David Williams

★ ★ ★ ★ ☆

February 22, 2025

As a scholar in webgpu, I found WebGPU and WGSL by Example: Fractals, Image Effects, Ray-Tracing, Procedural Geometry, 2D/3D, Particles, Simulations to be an exceptional contribution to the field. The author's approach to graphics is both innovative and rigorous, providing fresh insights that challenge conventional wisdom. Particularly noteworthy is the discussion of simulation, which offers a compelling framework for understanding ai. While some may argue that ray-tracing, the evidence presented is thorough and convincing. This book is essential reading for anyone serious about webgpu.

Jessica Jones

★ ★ ★ ★ ☆

June 2, 2025

WebGPU and WGSL by Example: Fractals, Image Effects, Ray-Tracing, Procedural Geometry, 2D/3D, Particles, Simulations is a comprehensive exploration of webgpu that manages to be both accessible to newcomers and valuable to experts. The book is divided into 3 sections, each building thoughtfully on the last. Part 1's discussion of graphics is particularly strong, with clear examples and practical applications. The diagrams and illustrations throughout help clarify complex ideas, and the chapter summaries are excellent for review. My only minor critique is that some examples felt dated, but this doesn't detract from the overall quality. This will undoubtedly become a standard reference in the field.

Discussion about webgpu in WebGPU and WGSL by Example: Fractals, Image Effects, Ray-Tracing, Procedural Geometry, 2D/3D, Particles, Simulations

Posted by Jennifer Rodriguez on July 25, 2025

Discussion: What did everyone think of the author's treatment of visualization? I found it more thorough compared to other works in the field.

James Williams July 28, 2025

Could you elaborate on what you mean by this? I'm not sure I follow.

Robert Williams July 24, 2025

To add to this, I found similar examples which seems to support your point.

James Johnson August 3, 2025

This reminds me of a similar condept from somewhere.

Discussion about visualization in WebGPU and WGSL by Example: Fractals, Image Effects, Ray-Tracing, Procedural Geometry, 2D/3D, Particles, Simulations

Posted by Thomas Garcia on July 26, 2025

Discussion: What did everyone think of the author's treatment of wgsl? I found it less convincing compared to other works in the field.

Sarah Miller July 30, 2025

Could you elaborate on what you mean by this? I'm not sure I follow.

Emily Johnson August 3, 2025

This reminds me of a similar condept from somewhere.

David Wilson August 1, 2025

This reminds me of a similar condept from somewhere.

Jessica Smith July 30, 2025

This reminds me of a similar condept from somewhere.

Lisa Davis July 21, 2025

Could you elaborate on what you mean by this? I'm not sure I follow.

Discussion about visualization in WebGPU and WGSL by Example: Fractals, Image Effects, Ray-Tracing, Procedural Geometry, 2D/3D, Particles, Simulations

Posted by Emily Davis on July 18, 2025

Discussion: What did everyone think of the author's treatment of simulation? I found it more thorough compared to other works in the field.

Robert Davis July 26, 2025

This reminds me of a similar condept from somewhere.

Lisa Brown July 28, 2025

This reminds me of a similar condept from somewhere.

Jennifer Garcia August 1, 2025

Could you elaborate on what you mean by this? I'm not sure I follow.

David Wilson July 31, 2025

To add to this, I found similar examples which seems to support your point.

Discussion about visualization in WebGPU and WGSL by Example: Fractals, Image Effects, Ray-Tracing, Procedural Geometry, 2D/3D, Particles, Simulations

Posted by Lisa Rodriguez on July 24, 2025

Discussion: What did everyone think of the author's treatment of simulation? I found it more technical compared to other works in the field.

David Rodriguez July 28, 2025

This reminds me of a similar condept from somewhere.

Thomas Garcia July 24, 2025

To add to this, I found similar examples which seems to support your point.

Michael Jones July 23, 2025

Could you elaborate on what you mean by this? I'm not sure I follow.

Jessica Smith July 31, 2025

This reminds me of a similar condept from somewhere.

David Williams July 25, 2025

Interesting perspective. I hadn't considered that angle before.

Discussion about simulation in WebGPU and WGSL by Example: Fractals, Image Effects, Ray-Tracing, Procedural Geometry, 2D/3D, Particles, Simulations

Posted by David Williams on July 28, 2025

Discussion: What did everyone think of the author's treatment of visualization? I found it more technical compared to other works in the field.

Emily Williams August 3, 2025

This reminds me of a similar condept from somewhere.

James Johnson July 31, 2025

This reminds me of a similar condept from somewhere.