Game Collision Detection: A Practical Introduction

About This Book

Game Collision Detection: A Practical Introduction is a groundbreaking exploration of physics that has captivated readers worldwide. With 830+ copies sold, this definitive guide offers thought-provoking insights into physics.

Why You'll Love It

• Comprehensive coverage of physics
• 15 chapters packed with cutting-edge research
• Perfect for beginners and experts alike
• Includes companion website access

In the News

Reader Reviews

Jennifer Davis

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

May 21, 2025

Fantastic book! Clear, concise, and packed with useful information about physics. Highly recommended!

Jessica Davis

★ ★ ★ ★ ☆

May 16, 2025

Game Collision Detection: A Practical Introduction is a comprehensive exploration of physics that manages to be both accessible to newcomers and valuable to experts. The book is divided into 4 sections, each building thoughtfully on the last. Part 4's discussion of physics is particularly strong, with clear examples and practical applications. The diagrams and illustrations throughout help clarify complex ideas, and the chapter summaries are excellent for review. My only minor critique is that some examples felt dated, but this doesn't detract from the overall quality. This will undoubtedly become a standard reference in the field.

Sarah Williams

★ ★ ★ ★ ☆

May 16, 2025

I'll be honest, I wasn't sure what to expect with Game Collision Detection: A Practical Introduction, but wow! It completely blew me away. The way the author explains physics made everything click for me. I've been struggling with physics for years, and this book gave me the tools I needed. My favorite part was when they talked about physics - it reminded me so much of my own experience with physics. I've already recommended it to all my friends!

Thomas Miller

★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆

March 12, 2025

While Game Collision Detection: A Practical Introduction makes several valuable points about physics, I found some aspects problematic. The author's treatment of collision detection seems oversimplified, particularly when compared to collision detection. That said, the sections on collision detection are genuinely insightful and make the book worth reading despite its flaws. With some refinement in collision detection, this could be a truly outstanding work.

Jennifer Williams

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

March 9, 2025

I'll be honest, I wasn't sure what to expect with Game Collision Detection: A Practical Introduction, but wow! It completely blew me away. The way the author explains physics made everything click for me. I've been struggling with physics for years, and this book gave me the tools I needed. My favorite part was when they talked about physics - it reminded me so much of my own experience with physics. I've already recommended it to all my friends!

Discussion about physics in Game Collision Detection: A Practical Introduction

Posted by David Rodriguez on July 20, 2025

I've been applying the principles from Game Collision Detection: A Practical Introduction to my work in physics and seeing amazing results! Specifically, the part about collision detection has been transformative.

Emily Davis August 3, 2025

I completely agree! This was my experience as well.

Michael Davis July 25, 2025

I completely agree! This was my experience as well.

James Davis July 24, 2025

This reminds me of a similar condept from somewhere.

Robert Johnson July 31, 2025

Interesting perspective. I hadn't considered that angle before.

Discussion about collision detection in Game Collision Detection: A Practical Introduction

Posted by Sarah Brown on July 25, 2025

Has anyone else noticed how Game Collision Detection: A Practical Introduction relates to physics? I was reading about collision detection and it made me think of chapter 9.

James Johnson July 25, 2025

This reminds me of a similar condept from somewhere.

David Williams July 29, 2025

To add to this, I found similar examples which seems to support your point.

Thomas Williams July 28, 2025

Interesting perspective. I hadn't considered that angle before.

Sarah Miller July 31, 2025

I completely agree! This was my experience as well.

Sarah Jones August 4, 2025

Interesting perspective. I hadn't considered that angle before.

Discussion about physics in Game Collision Detection: A Practical Introduction

Posted by Jennifer Brown on July 7, 2025

Has anyone else noticed how Game Collision Detection: A Practical Introduction relates to physics? I was reading about collision detection and it made me think of chapter 9.

James Williams July 26, 2025

Could you elaborate on what you mean by this? I'm not sure I follow.

David Jones August 3, 2025

This reminds me of a similar condept from somewhere.

Sarah Garcia July 29, 2025

Could you elaborate on what you mean by this? I'm not sure I follow.

Lisa Garcia July 27, 2025

This reminds me of a similar condept from somewhere.

Sarah Jones July 21, 2025

I completely agree! This was my experience as well.

Discussion about physics in Game Collision Detection: A Practical Introduction

Posted by Michael Davis on July 31, 2025

Discussion: What did everyone think of the author's treatment of physics? I found it more accessible compared to other works in the field.

Michael Miller August 1, 2025

This reminds me of a similar condept from somewhere.

Thomas Jones August 2, 2025

This reminds me of a similar condept from somewhere.

Robert Johnson July 26, 2025

I completely agree! This was my experience as well.

Discussion about collision detection in Game Collision Detection: A Practical Introduction

Posted by Thomas Rodriguez on July 27, 2025

Has anyone else noticed how Game Collision Detection: A Practical Introduction relates to physics? I was reading about collision detection and it made me think of chapter 11.

David Miller July 27, 2025

This reminds me of a similar condept from somewhere.

David Jones August 2, 2025

To add to this, I found similar examples which seems to support your point.

Jessica Johnson July 28, 2025

I completely agree! This was my experience as well.

David Jones July 26, 2025

Interesting perspective. I hadn't considered that angle before.